Background. The clinical significance of biopsies showing both rejection an
d isometric tubular vacuolization has not been well defined in the literatu
re.
Methods. The clinical picture, sequential histopathologic findings, and res
ponse to therapy were compared between 24 renal allograft biopsies showing
both tubular vacuolization and rejection and 14 biopsies showing vacuolizat
ion alone.
Results. The rejection was categorized as grade 1 in 4/24 (16.6%), grade 2A
in 10/24 (41.6%), and grade 2B in 10/24 (41.6%) cases (Banff schema, 1993-
1995), Treatment with additional steroids and tacrolimus led to a decrease
in the interstitial inflammation score (2.6+/-0.1 to 1.3+/-0.1, P<0.001), t
ubulitis score (2.6+/-0.1 to 1.1+/-0.1, P<0.001), and serum creatinine (4.4
+/-2.2 mg/dl to 3.3+/-2.6 mg/dl, P=0.001), Complete response, partial respo
nse and no response to antirejection therapy were observed in 16/24 (66.7%)
, 3/24 (12.5%), and 5/24 (20.8%) patients, respectively. Although there was
a rise in the plasma (1.4+/-0.2 ng/ml to 2.8+/-0.3 ng/ml, P<0.001) and who
le blood (16.5+/-2.8 ng/ml to 31.2+/-5.7 ng/ml, P<0.001) tacrolimus levels,
repeat biopsy showed no change in the size or extent of tubular vacuolizat
ion (mean score 2.88+/-0.19 vs. 2.83+/-0.21), The morphologic characteristi
cs of the tubular vacuoles in these cases did not differ from those observe
d in 14 cases of tacrolimus nephrotoxicity not complicated by rejection.
Conclusion. Patients with concurrent acute rejection and tubular vacuolizat
ion usually benefit from increased immunosuppression, The pathogenesis of t
he vacuolization in this clinical setting is not clear, but may reflect imm
une-mediated tubular injury.