Sbh. Timmis et al., Comparison of immediate and in-hospital results of conventional balloon and perfusion balloon angioplasty using intracoronary ultrasound, AM J CARD, 83(3), 1999, pp. 311-316
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Angiographic studies have demonstrated that perfusion balloon percutaneous
transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) may result in modestly improved lu
minal gains and fewer major dissections than conventional balloon PTCA. How
ever, intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS), which is more sensitive than angiogr
aphy in evaluating the incidence, extent, and severity of dissection, was n
ot used. We randomized 48 patients with 54 coronary stenoses to conventiona
l or perfusion balloon PTCA. Four 2-minute inflations were permitted with c
onventional balloon PTCA. Two 10-minute inflations were allowed with perfus
ion balloon PTCA. Quantitative coronary angiography and ICUS were performed
before and after treatment. In-hospital clinical events were recorded. Con
ventional and perfusion balloon PTCA achieved similar improvements in lumen
diameter (1.25 +/- 0.51 vs 1.28 +/- 0.51 mm) and reductions in percent ste
nosis (-45 +/- 21% vs -44 +/- 15%) by quantitative coronary angiography. Co
mparable gains in lumen diameter (0.62 +/- 0.39 vs 0.50 +/- 0.38 mm) and lu
men area (2.70 +/- 1.96 vs 2.05 +/- 1.52 mm(2)) were observed on ICUS. Angi
ography demonstrated similar rates of any dissection (36% vs 21%) and major
dissection (12% vs 7%). ICUS identified a similar incidence of any dissect
ion (60% vs 76%) and type II dissection (52% vs 62%). The relative dissecti
on area was also similar (9.2 +/- 5.6% vs 7.8 +/- 5.8%). One conventional b
alloon patient experienced postprocedural chest pain. No patient in either
group died, or had myocardial infarction, abrupt closure, or urgent revascu
larization. (C)1999 by Excerpta Medico, Inc.