Clinical efficacy and tolerability of a steady dosage schedule of local nasal immunotherapy. Results of preseasonal treatment in grass pollen rhinitis

Citation
M. Bertoni et al., Clinical efficacy and tolerability of a steady dosage schedule of local nasal immunotherapy. Results of preseasonal treatment in grass pollen rhinitis, ANN ALLER A, 82(1), 1999, pp. 47-51
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease
Journal title
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
ISSN journal
10811206 → ACNP
Volume
82
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
47 - 51
Database
ISI
SICI code
1081-1206(199901)82:1<47:CEATOA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Background: Local nasal immunotherapy (LNIT) is an effective and safe alter native to conventional subcutaneous immunotherapy. A specific nasal provoca tion test (SNPT) could be used to indicate the optimal subclinical dose to carry out LNIT. Objective: We hypothesize that LNIT could be carried out with only one pred efined dose for all patients, so we have evaluated the efficacy and the tol erability of LNIT administered at steady dosages in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Methods: Twenty grass pollen-sensitized patients suffering from seasonal al lergic rhinitis were studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-control led trial. The treatment was carried out according to a schedule based on t he administration of a steady subclinical dosage of the allergenic extract, selected on the basis of the sensitivity threshold of the SNPT. The patien ts were divided into two groups of 10 people each, which were treated eithe r with grass pollen extract in a hydroglyceric solution or with placebo. Results: During the peak pollen period, with regard to the placebo (P) grou p, in the grass treated (GT) group a significant decrease of both nasal sym ptoms (P = .021) and consumption of antihistamines (P = 0.047) was found. F urthermore, only in the GT group was the provocative dose assessed by the S NPT significantly lower (P = .049) at the end of the treatment. In this gro up of patients an inverse correlation between such provocative dose and the nasal symptom score reported during the peak pollen period was also eviden ced (r = 0.708; P = .038). Adverse reactions to LNIT were mild, rare, and d id not interfere with the completion of the therapeutic schedule. Conclusions: Our study indicates that LNIT, when administered at steady dos ages, may be proposed as a treatment for grass pollen seasonal allergic rhi nitis as it appears to be effective and well tolerated.