The strong opposition of nineteenth-century French chemists to atomism is u
sually described as a national attitude due to the overarching influence of
positivism in France. The explanation sounds plausible, at first glance. H
owever, the idea that a philosophy of science acted as an obstacle to the a
dvancement of science needs further investigation. What is meant exactly by
a philosophical influence on a scientific community? In analysing the alle
ged influence of positivism on the chemists' community it is argued that th
e common connection established between philosophical views and scientific
attitudes leads to a misunderstanding of both philosophy and scientific act
ivity. This paper first stresses the misreading of Auguste Comte's works; t
hen the misunderstanding of scientific debates about atomism in chemistry.
Finally it suggests an alternative view: that the atomic debates generated
a variety of positivisms.