E. Mitry et al., Irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy after failure to 5FU for metastaticcolorectal cancer: phase III trials, B CANCER, 1998, pp. 38-42
Treatments of advanced colorectal cancer progressing after a 5FU based chem
otherapy have not been extensively studied. However, 5FU in continuous infu
sion, L-OHP alone or in combination with 5FU and CPT11 have proved their ef
ficacy in terms of tumor growth control and symptomatic effect. Irinotecan
only has been evaluated prospectively in phase III studies.
This paper reports the results of the two randomized European studies which
have demonstrated the efficacy of irinotecan used at the dose of 350 mg/m(
2) administered over 30 minutes every 3 weeks in patients progressing after
a 5FU-based chemotherapy. The first study compared irinotecan versus best
supportive care in a group of 279 patients. It demonstrated an overall surv
ival benefit (9.2 versus 6.5 months, P < 0.0001) with a one-year survival o
f 36.2% for patients treated by irinotecan versus 13.8%. There was also a q
uality of life benefit, especially for asthenia and pain in favor of the ir
inotecan arm. The second study compared irinotecan to a second-line infusio
nal 5FU and randomized 260 patients. Irinotecan treated patients lived for
significantly longer than those on 5FU: median time of survival was 10.8 mo
nths versus 8.5 months (p = 0.035). Survival at 1 year was increased from 3
2% in the 5FU arm to 45% in the irinotecan arm. Pain-free survival and symp
tom-free survival were better for patients treated by irinotecan and the gl
obal quality of life score was in favor of irinotecan irinotecan when assig
ning null value to missing data due to death in both arms. Both treatments
were equally well tolerated. There two randomized studies have proved the e
fficacy of irinotecan ns second line chemotherapy for colorectal cancers pr
ogressing under 5FU. Combination of irinotecan to 5FU and/or L-OHP have now
to be evaluated in this situation.