A plethora of normative conservation concepts have recently emerged, most o
f which are ill-defined: biological diversity biological integrity, ecologi
cal restoration ecological services, ecological rehabilitation, ecological
sustainability, sustainable development ecosystem health, ecosystem managem
ent adaptive management and keystone species are salient among them These n
ormative concepts can be organized and interpreted by reference to two new
schools of conservation philosophy, compositionalism and functionalism. The
former comprehends nature primarily by means of evolutionary ecology and c
onsiders Homo sapiens separate from nature. The latter comprehends nature p
rimarily by means of ecosystem ecology and considers Homo sapiens a part Of
nature. Biological diversity, biological integrity and ecological restorat
ion belong primarily in the compositionalist glossary; the rest belong prim
arily in the functionalist glossary. The former set are more appropriate no
rms for reserves, the latter for areas that are humanly inhabited and explo
ited. In contrast to the older schools of conservation philosophy, preserva
tionism and resourcism, compositionalism and functionalism are complementar
y, not competitive and mutually exclusive. As the historically divergent ec
ological sciences-evolutionary ecology and ecosystem ecology-are increasing
ly synthesized, a more unified philosophy of conservation can be envisioned
.