L. Benassi et al., In vitro testing of tensides employing monolayer cultures: a comparison with results of patch tests on human volunteers, CONTACT DER, 40(1), 1999, pp. 38-44
Evaluation of the irritant potential of new products or ingredients prior t
o human resting is generally performed in vivo on animals. However, accordi
ng to the 6th amendment and following updates of the European Community dir
ective on cosmetic products (93/35/EEC), animal testing will be banned when
suitable substitutes will be available. To know whether in vitro tests for
assessment of skin irritancy provide results approaching human conditions,
comparisons have to be made between data deriving from in vitro tests and
skin response in humans. The aim of our study was to assess the validity of
the monolayer culture system of normal human keratinocytes as a model for
the evaluation of the irritant effects of detergents, by comparing in vitro
cell culture data to in vivo acute skin irritancy effects of cocamidopropy
l betaine (CAPB), an amphoteric compound, Tween 20 (TW20) (polysorbate 20)
and Tween 80 (TW80) (polysorbate 80), representing nonionic compounds, appl
ied to the skin of 24 healthy volunteers at a concentration similar to that
employed in commercial products. As parameters for cytotoxicity, cell prol
iferation, cell membrane integrity and cell metabolism were assessed by cel
l counts, thymidine incorporation, MTT conversion, and Neutral Red uptake.
In order to increase the sensitivity of the in vivo evaluation, bioengineer
ing methods for assessment of the effects of test products on the skin were
employed. Whereas all 4 in vitro methods ranked the tensides according to
their toxicity in the following order: CAPB>SLS>TW20>TW80, both in vivo met
hods agreed in identifying SLS as the most irritating substance. Moreover,
as compared with the irritation potential on human skin, all 4 in vitro tes
ts overestimated the toxicity of CAPB. This suggests that the keratinocyte
monolayer cell culture technique cannot directly replace in vivo methods, a
nd that data obtained by this method should be interpreted cautiously.