In this paper, the material injury outcome decisions of the Australian regu
latory authority (the Anti-Dumping Authority) are analyzed in order to dete
rmine which factors are influential in determining outcome decisions. The p
aper tests hypotheses concerning how the Australian authorities decide whet
her an Australian industry has suffered material injury as required under t
he relevant Australian legislation and the GATT/WTO obligations. The paper
concludes that even though the Australian authorities follow a procedurally
correct and GATT-consistent approach, there is nevertheless some evidence
of protectionist bins in favour of domestic industries.