Lignocaine has been used successfully to treat burn pain and neuropathic pa
in. We have conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to assess the morphi
ne-sparing effect of intravenous lignocaine in patients with acute pain. Af
ter major abdominal surgery, patients were treated with post-operative pati
ent-controlled intravenous analgesia in two groups: group M (n = 25, morphi
ne 0.2 mg mL(-1)) and group ML (n = 25, morphine 0.2 mg mL(-1) plus lignoca
ine 3.2 mg mL(-1)). The patient-controlled analgesia system was programmed
to deliver a 5 mL bolus with a 50 mL per 4 h limit; the lockout time was 10
min. Both groups closely resembled each other in terms of demographic data
, pain intensity, cumulative morphine dose and the morphine-associated naus
ea, vomiting and pruritus. However, the sedation scores in group ML patient
s during the first post-operative day were significantly greater than those
in group M. The incidence of lignocaine-related lightheadedness and dry mo
uth was also significantly greater in group ML than in group M. It was conc
luded that the addition of lignocaine 3.2 mg mL(-1) to morphine 0.2 mg mL(-
1) given via patient-controlled analgesia system does not provide a post-op
erative morphine-sparing analgesic effect.