Galvanic vestibular stimulation serves to modulate the continuous firing le
vel of the peripheral vestibular afferents. It has been shown that the appl
ication of sinusoidally varying, bipolar galvanic currents to the vestibula
r system can lead to sinusoidally varying postural sway. Our objective was
to test the hypothesis that stochastic galvanic vestibular stimulation can
lead to coherent stochastic postural sway. Bipolar binaural stochastic galv
anic vestibular stimulation was applied to nine healthy young subjects. Thr
ee different stochastic vestibular stimulation signals, each with a differe
nt frequency content (0-1 Hz, 1-2 Hz, and 0-2 Hz), were used. The stimulati
on level (range 0.4-1.5 mA, peak to peak) was determined on an individual b
asis. Twenty 60-s trials were conducted on each subject - 15 stimulation tr
ials (5 trials with each stimulation signal) and 5 control (no stimulation)
trials. During the trials, subjects stood in a relaxed, upright position w
ith their head facing forward. Postural sway was evaluated by using a force
platform to measure the displacements of the center of pressure (COP) unde
r each subject's feet. Cross-spectral measures were used to quantify the re
lationship between the applied stimulus and the resulting COP time series.
We found significant coherency between the stochastic vestibular stimulatio
n signal and the resulting mediolateral COP time series in the majority of
trials in 8 of the 9 subjects tested. The coherency results for each stimul
ation signal were reproducible from trial to trial, and the highest degree
of coherency was found for the 1- to 2-Hz stochastic vestibular stimulation
signal. In general, for the nine subjects tested, we did not find consiste
nt significant coherency between the stochastic vestibular stimulation sign
als and the anteroposterior COP time series. This work demonstrates that, i
n subjects who are facing forward, bipolar binaural stochastic galvanic sti
mulation of the vestibular system leads to coherent stochastic mediolateral
postural sway, but it does not lead to coherent stochastic anteroposterior
postural sway. Our finding that the coherency was highest for the 1- to 2-
Hz stochastic vestibular stimulation signal may be due to the intrinsic dyn
amics of the quasi-static postural control system. In particular, it may re
sult from the effects of the vestibular stimulus simply being superimposed
upon the quiet-standing COP displacements. By utilizing stochastic stimulat
ion signals, we ensured that the subjects could not predict a change in the
vestibular stimulus. Thus, our findings indicate that subjects can act as
"responders" to galvanic vestibular stimulation.