Standing on a continuously moving platform: is body inertia counteracted or exploited?

Citation
S. Corna et al., Standing on a continuously moving platform: is body inertia counteracted or exploited?, EXP BRAIN R, 124(3), 1999, pp. 331-341
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00144819 → ACNP
Volume
124
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
331 - 341
Database
ISI
SICI code
0014-4819(199902)124:3<331:SOACMP>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
We describe the characteristics of displacement of the head and hip in norm al young subjects standing on a moving platform undergoing continuous sinus oidal horizontal translation in the antero-posterior direction, at frequenc ies ranging from 0.1-1 Hz. The head, hip and malleolus were marked by light -emitting diodes (LEDs), and the displacement of each LED was quantified by (1) the measure of the shift during each cycle of translation, (2) the sta ndard deviation (SD) of the path travelled during the whole trial, (3) the power spectrum (PS) of the signal and (4) the cross-correlation (CC) betwee n pairs of LED signals. At each frequency of translation, with eyes open (E O), the displacement of head was smaller than that of hip, and the displace ment of hip was smaller than that of malleolus. With eyes closed (EC), this order was reversed. The peak value of the CC functions of the pairs malleo lus/head, malleolus/hip and hip/head decreased by passing from low to high frequency of translation, under both visual conditions, and decreased more for the pair malleolus/head than malleolus/hip. The lags between body segme nt displacements ranged between 30 ms and 150 ms, on average, the former se gment of each pair preceding the latter. The fast Fourier transformation of hip and head displacement showed a power spectrum peak at the frequency im posed by the platform translation. The peak was larger with EC than EO. Wit h EC, another peak appeared at 0.2 Hz, possibly corresponding to the respir atory frequency. We conclude that, when vision was allowed, subjects behave d as a non-rigid, noninverted pendulum, and stabilised head in space. When vision was denied, head oscillated more than the platform, especially at lo w translation frequencies. Therefore, the strategy of balance control shift ed from a pendulum to an inverted-pendulum behaviour, passing from active h ead-and-trunk control to maximal body compliance to the perturbation.