Repeat exposure to incremental doses of acetaminophen provides protection against acetaminophen-induced lethality in mice: An explanation for high acetaminophen dosage in humans without hepatic injury
Rm. Shayiq et al., Repeat exposure to incremental doses of acetaminophen provides protection against acetaminophen-induced lethality in mice: An explanation for high acetaminophen dosage in humans without hepatic injury, HEPATOLOGY, 29(2), 1999, pp. 451-463
In studies designed to simulate a clinical observation in which an individu
al became tolerant to normally lethal doses of acetaminophen (APAP), mice w
ere pretreated with increasing doses of APAP for 8 days and challenged on d
ay 9 with normally supralethal doses of APAP. These animals developed minim
al hepatotoxicity after a challenge dose with a fourfold increase in LD50 t
o 1,350 mg/kg, The pretreatment regimen resulted in hepatic changes includi
ng: centrilobular localization of 3-(cysteine-S-yl)APAP protein adducts, se
lective down-regulation of cytochrome P4502E1 (CYP2E1) and CYP1A2 that prod
uced the toxic metabolite, N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine, higher levels of
reduced glutathione (GSH), centrilobular inflammation, and a fourfold incre
ase in hepatocellular proliferation. The protection against the lethal APAP
doses afforded by pretreatment is secondary to these changes and to the as
sociated regional shift in the bioactivation of the APAP challenge dose fro
m centrilobular to periportal regions where CYP2E1 is not found, protective
GSH is more abundant, and where cell-proliferative responses are better ab
le to sustain repair. This shift in APAP bioactivation results in less-inte
nse covalent binding that is more diffuse and spread uniformly throughout t
he hepatic lobe, most likely contributing to protection by delaying the ear
ly onset of liver injury that has been generally associated with centrilobu
lar localization of the adducts, Intervention of APAP pretreatment-induced
cell division in mice with colchicine left them resistant to a 500-mg/kg (n
ormally lethal) dose of APAP, but unable to survive a 1,000-mg/kg APAP chal
lenge dose. The data demonstrate multiple mechanistic components to the pro
tection afforded by APAP pretreatment, Whereas metabolic and physiological
changes not dependent on cell proliferation are adequate to protect against
500 mg/kg APAP, these changes plus a potentiated cell-proliferative respon
se are necessary for protection against the supralethal 1,000-mg/kg APAP do
se. Furthermore, the data document an uncoupling of the traditional associa
tion between covalent binding and toxicity, and suggest that the assessment
of toxicity following repeated or chronic APAP exposure must consider alte
red drug interactions and parameters besides those historically used to ass
ess acute overdose.