Minimal cross-linking and epitope requirements for CD40-dependent suppression of apoptosis contrast with those for promotion of the cell cycle and homotypic adhesions in human B cells
Jd. Pound et al., Minimal cross-linking and epitope requirements for CD40-dependent suppression of apoptosis contrast with those for promotion of the cell cycle and homotypic adhesions in human B cells, INT IMMUNOL, 11(1), 1999, pp. 11-20
Eight different CD40 mAb shared with soluble trimeric CD40 ligand (sCD40LT)
the capacity to rescue germinal center (GC) B cells from spontaneous apopt
osis and to suppress antigen receptor-driven apoptosis in group I Burkitt's
lymphoma cells. Three mAb (G28-5, M2 and M3) mimicked sCD40LT in its abili
ty to promote strong homotypic adhesion in resting B cells, whereas others
(EA5, BL-OGY/C4 and 5C3) failed to stimulate strong clustering. Binding stu
dies revealed that only those mAb that promoted strong B cell clustering bo
und at, or near to, the CD40L binding site. While all eight mAb and sCD40LT
were capable of synergizing with IL-4 or phorbol ester for promoting DNA s
ynthesis in resting B cells, co-stimulus-independent activation of the cell
s into cycle through CD40 related directly to the extent of receptor cross-
linking. Thus, mAb which bound outside the CD40L binding site synergized wi
th sCD40LT for promoting DNA synthesis; maximal levels of stimulation were
achieved by presenting any of the mAb on CD32 transfectants in the absence
of sCD40LT or by cross-linking bound sCD40LT with a second antibody. Monome
ric sCD40L, which was able to promote rescue of GC B cells from apoptosis,
was unable to drive resting B cells into cycle. These studies demonstrate t
hat CD40-dependent rescue of human B cells from apoptosis requires minimal
cross-linking and is essentially epitope independent, whereas the requireme
nts for promoting cell cycle progression and homotypic adhesion are more st
ringent. Possible mechanisms underlying these differences and their physiol
ogical significance are discussed.