Traditional animal science curricula ignore sociological aspects of sc
ientific research and therefore portray scientific knowledge as value-
free. This view gives rise to a teaching method that involves impartin
g lists of scientific facts that are to be accepted by students withou
t critical evaluation. This amounts to little more than indoctrination
and misrepresents science as a system of knowledge. An alternative ap
proach is based on the view that science is a creative human activity
that reflects the values and biases of its practitioners. The goal of
this approach is to teach students to think analytically and to make i
ndependent judgments about scientific claims. This requires a scientif
ic literacy: an understanding of principal scientific theories, the na
ture of scientific research, and the relationship between science and
society. To achieve this goal, a teacher must become less of an author
ity figure, whose role is to simply pass on information, and more of a
facilitator, whose role is to promote questioning, exploration, and s
ynthesis. This requires a learning community in which students feel co
mfortable taking risks and develop the courage to make and defend judg
ments. This teaching approach enhances the intellectual and ethical de
velopment of students, allowing them to serve themselves and society i
n responsible ways.