Reply to "Comment on 'Enhancement of the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission produced by the addition of a pure tone in the guinea pig'" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 919-921 (1999)]
Gk. Yates et Rh. Withnell, Reply to "Comment on 'Enhancement of the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission produced by the addition of a pure tone in the guinea pig'" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 919-921 (1999)], J ACOUST SO, 105(2), 1999, pp. 922-924
In a recent paper Withnell and Yates [J. Acoust, Sec. Am. 104, 344-399 (199
8)] suggested that the TEOAE might be comprised of significant quantities o
f intermodulation distortion energy, based on a series of suppression exper
iments involving the measurement of the TEOAE with the addition of a pure t
one. Ren and Nuttall [J. Acoust. Sec. Am. 105, 919-921 (1999)] have suggest
ed an alternative explanation for our experiments, wherein a pure tone prod
uces a local impedance change in the nonlinear mechanical properties of the
basilar membrane: emission energy at frequencies below the frequency of th
e pure tone is suggested to arise from reflections at this impedance discon
tinuity. In this Letter. a response to their hypothesis is given, arguing t
hat it is not consistent with experimental findings, and that, in fact, the
TEOAE is comprised predominantly of intermodulation distortion energy [Yat
es and Withnell, Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. Abstr. 21, 5 ( 1998)]. (C) 1999 A
coustical Society of America. [S0001-4966(99)04102-8].