Concepts of neutrality and abstinence are discussed in terms of the variant
opinions about them, pro and con, with particular reference to efforts to
dispense with them based on the unavoidable role of the analyst's personal
influence and subjectivity in the analytic process. Stereotypes of both neu
trality and abstinence are examined, and the therapeutic alliance establish
ed as the most appropriate context within which to articulate the essential
and constructive role of effective analytic neutrality and abstinence. The
alliance is not possible without the persistent exercise of both neutralit
y and abstinence; conversely, other components of the alliance are intended
to facilitate and preserve neutrality and abstinence on the part of both a
nalyst and analysand. These elements are essential factors in effective ana
lytic practice.