S. Alloatti et al., Measurement of vascular access recirculation unaffected by cardiopulmonaryrecirculation: Evaluation of an ultrasound method, NEPHRON, 81(1), 1999, pp. 25-30
Recently developed devices provide detection of access recirculation (AR) a
nd cardiopulmonary recirculation (CPR) by optical, thermal, conducimetrical
, and ultrasound methods (USM). We evaluated the last one both in vitro rep
roducing AR by a bypass pump and in vivo. in vitro, the USM sensitivity was
about 5%. In vivo, the USM was compared with the traditional urea method (
UM) in 69 patients. 8.7% of the cases resulted positive by both UM and USM.
One case was USM positive and UM negative. The UM sensitivity threshold wa
s 6-10%. The accuracy (in vitro) and the repeatability (in vivo) of the USM
were satisfactory. USM clearly distinguished AR from CPR. In conclusion, A
R determination by USM, avoiding misleading interferences with CPR, is a ra
pid, easy, and noninvasive method to routinely exclude a potential cause of
reduced dialytic efficiency.