Dwj. Dippel et al., The diagnostic value of colour duplex ultrasound for symptomatic carotid stenosis in clinical practice, NEURORADIOL, 41(1), 1999, pp. 1-8
We assessed the accuracy of colour duplex ultrasound for the detection of s
evere (70-99 %) symptomatic carotid stenosis in a clinical setting, in orde
r to assess whether it could make carotid angiography unnecessary. In 152 p
atients with a transient ischaemic attack or nondisabling ischaemic stroke
in the carotid distribution, we compared the degree of colour duplex ultras
ound stenosis with angiographic stenosis by receiver-operating-characterist
ic analysis. The angiograms were evaluated by blinded observers, and compar
ed with routine reports of the colour duplex examination. We computed the s
ensitivity and specificity of colour duplex, and the number of angiograms a
nd sonographic studies needed to prevent one stroke within 3 years, taking
into account the risks of angiography, and the risks and efficacy of endart
erectomy. The estimates were adjusted for nonverification bias. We found 34
patients (22 %) with a severe (70-99 %) symptomatic carotid stenosis, In 1
6 patients (11 %)the symptomatic artery was occluded. The sensitivity and s
pecificity of duplex ultrasound were 76 % and 85 %, respectively. The numbe
r of patients needed to undergo angiography to prevent one stroke was reduc
ed from almost 200 to 33, when colour duplex was used as a preoperative exa
mination. After adjustment for the effects of nonverification, the sensitiv
ity dropped to 58 % and the number of duplex studies needed to prevent one
stroke would double. The number of angiograms needed after positive duplex
sonography would be virtually unaffected. Were colour duplex sonography to
have been the sole preoperative investigation, the number needed to diagnos
e to prevent one stroke within 3 years would be approximately 350, more tha
n twice as many as with the combined diagnostic strategy. The diagnostic ac
curacy of colour duplex sonography in clinical practice seems less impressi
ve than previous studies have suggested, but it remains an effective way to
select patients for angiography. Its use as a single pre-operative assessm
ent cannot be recommended.