Costs of reproduction are traditionally defined as reductions in the potent
ial for future fitness contributions, induced by current reproductive inves
tments, i.e. postbreeding costs. However, preparation for breeding and pare
ntal care may expose parents to survival costs already before offspring ind
ependence. Such prebreeding survival costs have only rarely been considered
in the context of life history evolution. Theoretical analyses show that p
re- and postbreeding costs have differential effects on fitness, and a dist
inction between these two systems of costs may therefore be of crucial impo
rtance in analyses of optimal parental investment.
With prebreeding costs, optimal parental investment is lower than with post
breeding costs, ceteris paribus. We illustrate this in a simple analysis of
optimal clutch size, and provide general conditions for optimal ditch size
with prebreeding and postbreeding costs, respectively. Through their diffe
rential effects on fitness, systems of costs may also influence and direct
the evolution of behavioural and physiological patterns associated with par
ental investments.
The distinction between pre- and postbreeding costs provides new perspectiv
es on costs of reproduction that may prove fruitful in the future developme
nt of life history theory. It also allows analyses of optimal life historie
s under reproductive costs in semelparous organisms. As predation may be an
important mechanism behind prebreeding survival costs, we emphasize the ro
le of predation and anti-predatory behaviour in the evolution of life histo
ries and breeding behaviour.