Successful distraction osteogenesis across a growing cranial suture without an osteotomy

Citation
Th. Tung et al., Successful distraction osteogenesis across a growing cranial suture without an osteotomy, PLAS R SURG, 103(2), 1999, pp. 362-370
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
ISSN journal
00321052 → ACNP
Volume
103
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
362 - 370
Database
ISI
SICI code
0032-1052(199902)103:2<362:SDOAAG>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
The application of distraction osteogenesis to the membranous bones of the craniofacial skeleton and its effects on cranial volume and overall skull s hape have not been fully studied. This pilot study was designed to compare distraction of a cranial suture in the rabbit model with distraction across an osteotomy and to evaluate the response of the suture both grossly and h istologically. Additionally, the need for a period of rigid fixation after distraction was evaluated. Calibrated distraction of either the coronal suture or an osteotomy in the midsection of the parietal bone using an internal distracter (Synthes Maxil lofacial, Paoli, Pa.) was studied in juvenile and adult New Zealand White r abbits. Skull growth and distraction were followed by serial cephalograms, and bone biopsies of the distracted sites were obtained after death for his tologic evaluation. Craniometric analysis of the skulls was also performed. There was significantly greater mean marker separation in the juvenile sutu re distraction group (6.6 +/- 0.2 mm; n = 3) than in the control group (2.2 +/- 0.2 mm; P < 0.01). Marker separation was also significantly greater ac ross the parietal osteotomy (6.4 +/- 0.1 mm) than in the sham group (no mar ker separation). Craniometric data demonstrated the ability of the juvenile skull to distribute the change at the coronal suture throughout the skull to maintain symmetry and minimize disproportion. No distraction was obtaine d across the adult suture. Is the juvenile suture distraction group without a period of stable fixation, a relapse of 17 +/- 6 percent was noted after 1 week, an additional 2.3 +/- 0.5 percent after the second week, and no fu rther change in the third postdistraction week (n = 2: p < 0.01). These results show that in this animal model, distraction osteogenesis can be achieved across a growing cranial suture without an osteotomy of suturec tomy and that the degree of distraction and new bone formation is comparabl e to that across an osteotomy. This suggests that cranial expansion can be obtained in a growing animal without using a more invasive cranial osteotom y. Additionally, the first week after. distraction seems to be the most cri tical time period to maintain stable fixation.