Bm. Rosenn et M. Miodovnik, Antenatal fetal testing in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetesmellitus: why, who and how?, PRENAT N M, 3(6), 1998, pp. 550-554
Most obstetricians adopt some form of strategy for a antenatal fetal testin
g in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). There
are, however, wide differences of opinion among providers as to the preferr
ed protocol for such testing. The optimal method of fetal surveillance, the
gestational age at which to start testing, the frequency of testing and ev
en whether all patients with GDM require antenatal testing are all controve
rsial, unresolved issues. Indeed, in the absence of prospective, randomized
clinical trials, it is impossible to determine whether antenatal fetal tes
ting is beneficial in uncomplicated GDM. Moreover, it appears that, even wi
th the employment of well-defined antenatal testing protocols, it is unavoi
dable that some women with GDM will experience an unexplained third-trimest
er stillbirth. Not least important are the issues of cost-benefit with a st
rategy of universal antenatal testing in GDM and the rate of unnecessary ob
stetric interventions that may result from such a strategy. Consequently, t
he Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of North America has proposed a random
ized clinical trial as a first effort to try and resolve some of these perp
lexing issues.