Has it been demonstrated that distance learning is as effective as face-to;
face learning? This paper, proposing a "three circle" model of postsecondar
y education, argues that measurable competence, though a central component
of education, is not in itself an adequate indicator of educational effecti
veness. The model, supported by research into educational effects, is discu
ssed in relation to the distinction between semantic memory and episodic me
mory, and in relation to the role of context in memory. Analysis of a widel
y-cited summary of 248 studies comparing distance learning and face-to-face
learning concludes that these studies, which generally fail to go beyond m
easurable competence, and fail as well to support the newer interactive tec
hnologies commonly associated with distance learning, do not support any tr
ansfer of postsecondary education from the classroom to the screen. The lim
itations of distance learning are discussed in relation to their broader so
cial implications.