Hs. Gilmer-hill et al., Intrathecal morphine delivered via subcutaneous pump for intractable pain in pancreatic cancer, SURG NEUROL, 51(1), 1999, pp. 6-11
BACKGROUND Pain secondary to unresectable pancreatic cancer is frequently s
evere and extremely difficult to control with traditional methods of analge
sia. This retrospective study reports the analgesic effects of intrathecal
morphine sulfate by implanted infusion pumps in nine patients with unresect
able adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
METHODS Nine patients were implanted over a P-year period, Preoperative mor
phine IV equivalents were a mean of 81.51 mg/day, with a range of 20-140 mg
/day, Patients were hospitalized for a trial dose of 1-2 mg of intrathecal
Duramorph, 1 mg/ml, via lumbar puncture to assess whether adequate pain rel
ief could be achieved and whether there would be drug-related side effects,
RESULTS All patients who received a trial dose experienced excellent pain r
elief, and subsequently underwent implantation of a lumbar subarachnoid cat
heter and infusion pump during the same hospitalization. The mean number of
days from diagnosis to pump implant was 119, with a range of 3-587 days. T
he mean maximum daily dose was 21.28 mg, with a range of 3-73.10 mg, No pat
ient experienced respiratory depression or excess sedation which prevented
achievement of pain control. Minor supplemental narcotic use was documented
in three of the nine patients. Assessment of pain control was made by the
level of activity and the analog pain scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 be
ing the worst pain imaginable, All of the patients experienced good to exce
llent relief of pain. The mean duration of intrathecal morphine sulfate use
until death was 137.3 days, with a range of 52-354 days.
CONCLUSIONS This series of nine patients indicates that long-term administr
ation of intrathecal morphine via implanted infusion pump in patients with
pancreatic cancer is both efficacious and safe, All patients and their fami
lies reported an improved quality of life with an increased level of activi
ty. (C) 1999 by Elsevier Science Inc.