Background: Over the past several years, there has been a resurgence of int
erest in telemedicine. Despite this renewed interest, some health care prov
iders remain skeptical regarding the effectiveness of telemedicine for the
delivery of health care.
Objective: The objective of this prospective, crossover study was to determ
ine if there was any difference between care delivered using video conferen
cing-based telemedicine technology and that given by a traditional face-to-
face encounter in a pulmonary medicine clinic.
Methods: Two pulmonologists sequentially examined 40 individuals via video
conferencing-based telemedicine technology and by the traditional face-to-f
ace method. Two additional pulmonologists, in a blinded fashion, compared t
he results for consistency in the history, examination with focus on auscul
tation of the lungs, diagnostic impression, and evaluation and treatment pl
ans.
Results: Evaluation of patients by telemedicine was as effective as the tra
ditional mode. The telemedicine physician and the physician examining the p
atient in the traditional manner were able to elicit the same key complaint
s and hear the same adventitious sounds on auscultation of the lungs.
Conclusion: Telemedicine can enable the provision of high-quality care in a
pulmonary clinic setting.