Objective-To determine the most effective and reliable method for progressi
ve attenuation of single extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs.
Study Design-The effects of the four treatments on femoral vein diameter an
d histology were compared with controls.
Animals-Fourteen healthy adult dogs.
Methods-Twenty-eight canine femoral veins were subjected to sham surgery (4
), partial attenuation using silk (5), cellophane banding (6), ameroid cons
trictor implantation (5), and intravascular thrombogenic coils (8). Changes
in vein diameter were evaluated at weekly intervals using venography. Afte
r 6 weeks, the dogs were humanely euthanatized, and histopathology was perf
ormed on the femoral veins.
Results-Only cellophane and ameroid constrictors produced progressive and p
ermanent Vein attenuation. Ameroid constrictors produced complete occlusion
within 14 days in four of five veins and by 21 days in the fifth vein. Cel
lophane banding produced slow progressive (but not complete) attenuation in
five of six veins. Complete occlusion was demonstrated in four of eight ve
ins after thrombogenic coil implantation; however, recanalization occurred
in all but one dog. Perivascular silk did not produce significant progressi
ve attenuation.
Conclusions-Ameroid constrictors produced rapid occlusion of femoral veins.
Cellophane banding resulted in slower attenuation. Thrombogenic coils prod
uced attenuation, bur this was not sustained in many cases. Silk did not pr
omote ongoing attenuation.
Clinical Relevance-Both ameroid constrictor implantation and cellophane ban
ding show promise for progressive attenuation of single extrahepatic portos
ystemic shunts in dogs. Because rapid occlusion was seen with ameroid const
rictors, however, cellophane banding maybe a safer technique in animals wit
h increased hepatic vascular resistance. Further evaluation of both treatme
nts in clinical cases is warranted. (C)Copyright 1999 by The American Colle
ge of Veterinary Surgeons.