Bj. Robinson et al., A review of recovery from sevoflurane anaesthesia: Comparisons with isoflurane and propofol including meta-analysis, ACT ANAE SC, 43(2), 1999, pp. 185-190
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Background: Sevoflurane has a lower blood:gas partition coefficient than is
oflurane and thus should be associated with a more rapid recovery from anae
sthesia.
Methods: A review and meta-analysis were employed to examine the recovery p
rofiles of adult patients following anaesthesia, comparing sevoflurane to i
soflurane and sevoflurane to propofol.
Results: There were significant differences in times to several recovery ev
ents that favoured sevoflurane to isoflurane anaesthesia, including time to
emergence, response to commands, extubation, and orientation. Likewise, th
ere were significant differences in times to the same recovery events follo
wing anaesthesia with sevoflurane versus propofol. There were no difference
s in time to recovery room discharge when comparing sevoflurane to isoflura
ne or propofol.
Conclusion: The observed differences between sevoflurane and isoflurane or
propofol anaesthesia support the postulate that the use of sevoflurane is a
ssociated with a more rapid recovery from anaesthesia than either isofluran
e or propofol.