Purpose: This study compares 35-mm transparencies with colour digital fundu
s images.
Methods: Colour fundus photos were acquired simultaneously on a digital sys
tem and on 35-mm film on 32 consecutive patients. These were assessed indep
endently by two ophthalmologists who graded overall picture quality and gra
nularity of the images. They also assessed if the images were adequate for
the purpose of making a diagnosis. An analysis of the costs of the two syst
ems was performed.
Results: The film images had significantly better scores for overall pictur
e quality (p=0.0001, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.5) and granularity (p<0.0001, 95% CI 1
.5 to 2). However, both digital and film images were considered adequate fo
r diagnosis (p=0.052, 95% CI 0.12 to 8.32).
Conclusion: The quality of digital images is acceptable for diagnostic purp
oses although resolution is limited. Other advantages and developing techno
logies will make it increasingly attractive in the future.