Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Diagnostic value of echo-enhanced transcranial Doppler sonography compared with angiography

Citation
Mm. Uggowitzer et al., Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Diagnostic value of echo-enhanced transcranial Doppler sonography compared with angiography, AM J NEUROR, 20(1), 1999, pp. 101-106
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
01956108 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
101 - 106
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-6108(199901)20:1<101:CAMDVO>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to examine the clinica l value of echo-enhanced transcranial power Doppler sonography (EE-TCD), in cluding it ability to assess hemodynamic parameters of the intracranial vas culature, in patients with suspected cerebral arteriovenous malformations ( AVMs) and to compare this method with angiography, METHODS: Sixteen patients with suspected cerebral AVMs were examined with E E-TCD and angiography. As an echo-enhancing agent, SHU 508A (Levovist) was administered intravenously by bolus injection in nine patients and by conti nuous infusion in seven. Sonograms were reviewed without knowledge of other imaging results and were correlated with angiographic findings. RESULTS: Angiography showed AVMs in 12 of 16 patients. Eleven lesions were located in the anterior or middle fossa and one was in the posterior fossa, EE-TCD was slightly less sensitive in the detection of AVMs (92%, 11/12 le sions), since in one patient the lacking acoustic window did not allow a tr anscranial examination. EE-TCD slightly underestimated AVM size compared wi th angiographic findings but showed feeding arteries with sufficient acoust ic properties. In seven patients (58%), angiography revealed a coincidental blood supply from another intracranial or extracranial vessel, which was m issed by EE-TCD in all cases. Assessment of peak systolic velocities and re sistive indexes resulted in a higher (mean, 191.1 cm/s) and a lower (mean, 45.7%) value, respectively, in the feeding arteries as compared with the co ntralateral arteries (mean, 101.8 cm/s and 55.6%, respectively). Side-to-si de differences were significantly higher in patients with AVMs than in thos e without a malformation. Signal enhancement was markedly longer with conti nuous infusion (mean, 520 seconds a 28.2) than with bolus injection (mean, 145 seconds a 10.5) of the contrast agent. CONCLUSION: In our limited study group, EE-TCD was a sensitive method for t he detection of AVMs, and Levovist proved to be a safe and effective echo-e nhancing substance.