Mm. Uggowitzer et al., Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Diagnostic value of echo-enhanced transcranial Doppler sonography compared with angiography, AM J NEUROR, 20(1), 1999, pp. 101-106
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Neurosciences & Behavoir
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to examine the clinica
l value of echo-enhanced transcranial power Doppler sonography (EE-TCD), in
cluding it ability to assess hemodynamic parameters of the intracranial vas
culature, in patients with suspected cerebral arteriovenous malformations (
AVMs) and to compare this method with angiography,
METHODS: Sixteen patients with suspected cerebral AVMs were examined with E
E-TCD and angiography. As an echo-enhancing agent, SHU 508A (Levovist) was
administered intravenously by bolus injection in nine patients and by conti
nuous infusion in seven. Sonograms were reviewed without knowledge of other
imaging results and were correlated with angiographic findings.
RESULTS: Angiography showed AVMs in 12 of 16 patients. Eleven lesions were
located in the anterior or middle fossa and one was in the posterior fossa,
EE-TCD was slightly less sensitive in the detection of AVMs (92%, 11/12 le
sions), since in one patient the lacking acoustic window did not allow a tr
anscranial examination. EE-TCD slightly underestimated AVM size compared wi
th angiographic findings but showed feeding arteries with sufficient acoust
ic properties. In seven patients (58%), angiography revealed a coincidental
blood supply from another intracranial or extracranial vessel, which was m
issed by EE-TCD in all cases. Assessment of peak systolic velocities and re
sistive indexes resulted in a higher (mean, 191.1 cm/s) and a lower (mean,
45.7%) value, respectively, in the feeding arteries as compared with the co
ntralateral arteries (mean, 101.8 cm/s and 55.6%, respectively). Side-to-si
de differences were significantly higher in patients with AVMs than in thos
e without a malformation. Signal enhancement was markedly longer with conti
nuous infusion (mean, 520 seconds a 28.2) than with bolus injection (mean,
145 seconds a 10.5) of the contrast agent.
CONCLUSION: In our limited study group, EE-TCD was a sensitive method for t
he detection of AVMs, and Levovist proved to be a safe and effective echo-e
nhancing substance.