Oral trovafloxacin compared with intravenous cefoxitin in the prevention of bacterial infection after elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease

Citation
S. Roy et al., Oral trovafloxacin compared with intravenous cefoxitin in the prevention of bacterial infection after elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease, AM J SURG, 176(6), 1998, pp. 62S-66S
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00029610 → ACNP
Volume
176
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Supplement
S
Pages
62S - 66S
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9610(199812)176:6<62S:OTCWIC>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trovafloxacin is a new fourth-generation fluoroquinolone whose pharmacokinetics and in vitro activity suggest that it is well suited for a ntibiotic prophylaxis in elective hysterectomy. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, parallel groups of women 18 years of age or older received either 200 mg trovafloxacin by m outh and intravenous (IV) placebo or 2 g cefoxitin by IV infusion and place bo by mouth before elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalign ant disease. RESULTS: In the 103 and 97 patients in the trovafloxacin and cefoxitin grou ps, respectively, who were evaluable for efficacy, the prophylactic success rates at hospital discharge (96% in both groups) and 30 +/- 6 days after h ysterectomy (88% and 91% in the trovafloxacin and cefoxitin groups, respect ively) were statistically equivalent; Both antibiotics were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: A Single oral 200 mg dose of trovafloxacin is as effective and safe as a standard cefoxitin parenteral regimen in the prevention of primar y bacterial infection after elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease. (C) 1998 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.