The Ediacaran fossils of the latest Precambrian have at one time or another
been grouped with almost every extant kingdom, and also lumped into separa
te kingdom-level taxa. This has often been based on the facile use of a few
characters, or on some sort of "overall similarity." This has not been a v
ery fruitful approach; if anything, it has held back understanding of the E
diacaran organisms and of their significance for later history. While many
of the simpler forms remain problematic, careful study of the more complex
forms gives good reasons to place at least some of them with the Animalia.
A complementary approach is to use sources of information such as the distr
ibution of fossils across space, time, and paleoenvironments. The results m
ay feed back into systematic work, allowing us to construct and test more r
obust hypotheses of these organisms' evolutionary relationships.