Long-term maize, sorghum, and millet monoculture effects on an Argentina Typic Ustipsamment

Citation
De. Buschiazzo et al., Long-term maize, sorghum, and millet monoculture effects on an Argentina Typic Ustipsamment, ARID SOIL R, 13(1), 1999, pp. 1-15
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ARID SOIL RESEARCH AND REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
08903069 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1 - 15
Database
ISI
SICI code
0890-3069(199901/03)13:1<1:LMSAMM>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Maize, sorghum, and millet monoculture effects on soil properties of a Typi c Ustipsamment in the semiarid pampa of Argentina were evaluated after 27 y ears in a plot experiment. A permanent Eragrostis curvula pasture was used as a reference. Miller was the most destructive crop to the soil because it decreased dry aggregate stability by 10%, soil organic matter (OM) by 30%, extractable K by 20%, available P by 44%, inorganic P by 11%, available Fe by 20%, available Zn more than 90%, available Cu by 30%, and available Mn by 26%, and it increased wet aggregate instability by 75%. Grain sorghum wa s less destructive to the soil than millet because it only decreased OM by 30% and extractable K by 24%. All studied crops decreased the cation exchan ge capacity of the soil between 20 and 30%, the pH values, and the concentr ation of soil extractable Mg2+ by 38 to 63%. Soil extractable Ca2+ was decr eased 30% by the Eragrostis pasture and 40% by maize. The negative effect o f millet and grain sorghum on OM was attributed to a low coverage of the so il with plant residues left by these crops as well as the long exposition o f the bare soil during temperate and wet periods. Decreases of soil nutrien t contents were attributed to plant uptake in all cases, except the Zn conc entrations, which were related to variations on soil pH and phosphate conce ntrations. It was concluded that maize, the most commonly cultivated crop i n the region studied, did not affect physical and chemical soil properties to a large extent. Conversely, millet had the most negative effect on physi cal and chemical properties of the soil.