The speech recognition threshold (SRT) is believed to be related primarily
to the pure-tone average (PTA) and the steepness of the hearing loss. Howev
er, there are indications that it may also be influenced by perceptual or c
ognitive-linguistic factors, or both, such as meaningfulness of the speech
stimuli. The purpose of the present study was to ascertain the corresponden
ce between SRT and PTA in noise-exposed workers with various degrees of spe
ech recognition threshold shift in noise. To this end, a total of 807 SRTs
and PTAs collected from fluent speakers of Quebec French noise-exposed work
ers were compared. Measurements of context effects on speech recognition we
re taken based on a general hypothesis that they should be facilitating pho
neme or word restoration in conditions of high stimulus uncertainty as pres
ent in SRT assessment, thus acting to confound the SRT-PTA relationship. Us
ing principal components analysis, we found a significant effect not only o
f low-frequency hearing sensitivity but language context effects on SRT. Af
ter a correction was introduced to partial out these linguistic context eff
ects, correlations between SRT and PTA increased but they were lower than p
redicted. In a related treatment analysis, we found a large number of obser
vations (230 out of 807) where SRTs were more sensitive than PTAs by a fact
or of 8 to 16 dB. This was the case even though correlations between the tw
o measurements were within the range commonly advocated in the field of cli
nical audiology (0.85-0.95). This was interpreted as a sign of phonological
and lexical context effects on the speech recognition task actually used b
y individual subjects to facilitate speech understanding, to the point perh
aps of making it as simple as the detection of pure tones.