Impact of cyclosporine and methylprednisolone dose used for prophylaxis and therapy of graft-versus-host disease on survival and relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
M. Michallet et al., Impact of cyclosporine and methylprednisolone dose used for prophylaxis and therapy of graft-versus-host disease on survival and relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, BONE MAR TR, 23(2), 1999, pp. 145-150
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
In order to determine whether doses of cyclosporine and methylprednisolone
used for prophylaxis and therapy of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)
have any influence on relapse and survival following allogeneic bone marrow
transplantation (BMT), we studied 176 adult patients with hematologic mali
gnancies, who underwent a first allogeneic transplant from an HLA-identical
sibling donor. Two methods of management of acute GVHD used in two differe
nt centers were compared: group I included 62 patients who had 'standard' m
anagement of GVHD including prophylaxis with 1-3 mg/kg/day of cyclosporine
and treatment with 2 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone when acute GVHD develo
ped; group II included 114 patients who received 'intensive' management of
GVHD including prophylaxis with 5 mg/kg/day of cyclosporine and treatment w
ith high-dose methylprednisolone (8-20 mg/kg/day for 3 days) at the onset o
f GVHD, The overall incidence of GVHD was the same in both groups. However,
acute GVHD was more severe in group I than in group II (P < 0.0001), with
consequently less resolution of GVHD after treatment in group I (61%) than
in group LI (80%) (P = 0.06). Overall survival and disease-free survival (D
FS) did not differ between the two groups. However, actuarial risk of disea
se relapse was significantly higher in group II than in group I (36% vs 17%
, P = 0.02). In a multivariate analysis taking into account known factors i
nfluencing GVHD and relapse, only type of GVHD management and age were sign
ificantly predictive for the occurrence of GVHD, while only type of GVHD ma
nagement and pathology other than chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) were predi
ctive for relapse, This study demonstrates that intensity of GVHD prophylax
is and therapy can influence the graft-versus-leukemia effect by decreasing
severity of GVHD but at the price of increasing relapse rate post transpla
nt.