We have conducted a randomized, double-blind comparison of 4% and 8% sevofl
urane for induction of anaesthesia in unpremedicated patients aged more tha
n 60 yr. Sevoflurane was inhaled in 50% nitrous oxide using a vital capacit
y breath technique, and mean, systolic and diastolic arterial pressures and
heart rate were monitored continuously using a Finapres cuff. In the 8% se
voflurane group, time to successful laryngeal mask insertion was significan
tly shorter (mean 168 (SD 34) s vs 226 (62) s; P < 0.01) and achieved more
often at the first attempt than in the 4% sevoflurane group. Arterial press
ures were lower in the 8% group, but this was not significant. No patient h
ad apnoea lasting longer than I min. A total of 69% of patients described i
nduction as pleasant and 85% would choose to have it again. We conclude tha
t compared with 8% sevoflurane, the use of 4% sevoflurane in the elderly re
sulted in greater cardiovascular stability but at the cost of prolonged and
occasionally unsuccessful induction.