Aims-To evaluate temporal contrast sensitivity with full field, peripheral,
and central stimulation and to determine the most sensitive corresponding
retinal area for glaucoma damage.
Methods-Temporal contrast sensitivity was determined either with a full fie
ld, a peripheral annular area from 30 degrees to 90 degrees, or a central a
rea from 0 degrees to 30 degrees at a frequency of 37.1 Hz. 232 eyes of 232
subjects were included. They were classified into four groups: eyes with o
cular hypertension (OHT, n = 54), "preperimetric" glaucomas (n = 73) with g
laucomatous optic disc abnormalities but no visual field loss, "perimetric"
glaucomas (n = 53) with visual field loss, and 52 normals.
Results-In all four groups, temporal contrast senstitivity was almost equal
with full field and peripheral, but significantly higher than with central
stimulation (p<0.001). With regard to the diagnostic power of the three di
fferent stimulus areas, OHTs and glaucomas were found to be best discrimina
ted from normals by peripheral stimulation.
Conclusions-According to these results, temporal contrast sensitivity seems
to be determined by peripheral retinal areas. As the diagnostic power of t
he three different stimulus areas was best with the peripheral stimulation,
this condition should be used for early glaucoma diagnosis.