Inefficient irrigation strategies delivering an excess of irrigation water
can result in pesticides and nitrates being leached to groundwater. However
, information on the environmental impact of irrigation strategies is not r
eadily available to either growers or the local authority responsible for w
ater consents. Improved irrigation practices can be promoted by making this
information more readily available in the form of a decision support syste
m (DSS) linked to the water allocation process. Under this approach, grower
s would be required to submit to the local authority an irrigation manageme
nt plan (IMP) which details how they intend to irrigate the crop in each of
their management blocks. Sufficient information about the soil, crop, irri
gation system and scheduling mechanism would have to be supplied in the IMP
to allow it to be evaluated from an environmental impact perspective. The
IMP is evaluated by a water allocation consent officer with the help of the
decision support system, in which is incorporated environmental impact kno
wledge. This DSS integrates a simulation model SWIM, a decision tree, and s
cientific soil hydraulic data. The simulation model is used to estimate the
likely water requirement of the grower under the IMP. The decision tree re
presents expert heuristics on the effects of the various irrigation strateg
ies. The soil hydraulic data provides soil hydraulic properties to SWIM and
to the decision tree. Local authorities and growers can use the DSS to lea
rn about the likely environmental impact and water requirements of each gro
wer. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.