Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology

Citation
Js. Gravel et al., Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology, EAR HEAR, 20(1), 1999, pp. 1-11
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Otolaryngology
Journal title
EAR AND HEARING
ISSN journal
01960202 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1 - 11
Database
ISI
SICI code
0196-0202(199902)20:1<1:CSRINU>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine children's speech recog nition abilities for words and sentences presented in background noise when the children used omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technol ogy. Design: Twenty children (ten 4- to 6-yr olds; ten 7- to 11-yr-olds) with bi lateral cochlear hearing loss (average four-frequency hearing loss = 57.25 dB HL; range: mild to severe) were included in the study. An adaptive test procedure was used to estimate a signal to noise ratio (SNR) that reduced i ndividual speech recognition ability to 50% in multi-talker background comp etition. Testing was completed with the child seated in a conventional audi ologic test suite. A fixed level of the speech signal was delivered through a loudspeaker located at 0 degrees; noise varying in 2 dB steps was presen ted at 180 degrees. SNR was estimated for two types of speech materials (cl osed-set words and sentences), Children wore binaural programmable hearing aids (Phonak PiCS) and were tested in conventional omni-directional and dua l-microphone ("Audio Zoom") conditions. Results: Significant effects of microphone condition, speech material type (words and sentences), and age group ("younger" and "older") were revealed by mixed design analysis of variance, Overall, children received a mean adv antage of 4.7 dB from listening in the dual-microphone condition. Children' s performance was correlated with their chronological age and language age (receptive vocabulary) but not with their degree of hearing loss (except in one condition). Younger children required a more advantageous SNR to achie ve the same performance criteria as older children. Conclusions: Under the specific test conditions used in this investigation, dual-microphone hearing aid technology provided a significant listening ad vantage in background competition over conventional omni-directional microp hones for children with mild to severe cochlear hearing loss for both word and sentence test materials.