Clinical value of using an automated sperm morphology analyzer (IVOS)

Citation
K. Coetzee et al., Clinical value of using an automated sperm morphology analyzer (IVOS), FERT STERIL, 71(2), 1999, pp. 222-225
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
FERTILITY AND STERILITY
ISSN journal
00150282 → ACNP
Volume
71
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
222 - 225
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-0282(199902)71:2<222:CVOUAA>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Objective: To determine the clinical value of automated normal sperm morpho logy outcomes. Design: Prospective clinical study. Setting: Clinical and research assisted reproduction laboratory. Patient(s): Two hundred seven GIFT cycles. Intervention(s): The wife was induced to superovulate, laparoscopically asp irated, and the gametes were transferred laparoscopically. The husband's sp erm morphology was evaluated with use of a sperm morphology analyzer using the strict criteria classification system. Main Outcome Measure(s): Normal sperm morphology, IVF, and pregnancy outcom es. Result(s): The logistic regression model showed that normal sperm morpholog y was significantly associated with fertilization in vitro, as dependent (a ge) and independent variables. Analyzing the fertilization rates across the 5% normal sperm morphology cutoff point, a fertilization rate of 39.39% (l ess than or equal to 5%)) compared with 62.92% (>5%) was obtained. The logi stic regression model showed that normal sperm morphology was also a signif icant predictor of pregnancy when allowing for the number of oocytes transf erred and female age. Analyzing the pregnancy rates across the 5% normal sp erm morphology cutoff point, pregnancy rates of 15.15% (less than or equal to 5%) and 37.36% (>5%) were obtained. Conclusion(s): Normal sperm morphology as evaluated by the automated semen analyzer (IVOS) was shown to adhere to the same fertility cutoff point (5%) , as determined by the manual evaluation of sperm morphology. Automated nor mal sperm morphology outcomes also were found to be significant predictors of IVF and pregnancy in a GIFT program. (Fertil Steril(R) 1999;71:222-5. (C ) 1999 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.).