Transformation to zero offset (TZO), alternatively known as migration to ze
ro offset (MZO), or the combination of normal moveout and dip moveout (NMO/
DMO), is a process that transforms data collected at finite offset between
source and receiver to a pseudozero offset trace. The kinematic validity o
f NMO/DMO processing has been well established. The TZO integral operators
proposed here differ from their NMO/DMO counterparts by a simple amplitude
factor. (The form of the operator depends on how the input and output varia
bles are chosen from among the combinations of midpoint or wavenumber with
time or frequency.) With this modification in place, the dynamical validity
for planar reflectors of the proposed TZO operators of this paper have bee
n established in earlier studies. This means that the traveltime and geomet
rical spreading terms of the finite offset data are transformed to their co
unterparts for zero offset data, while the finite offset reflection coeffic
ient is preserved.
The main purpose of this study is to show that dynamical validity of the TZ
O operator extends to the case of curved reflectors in the 2.5-D limit. Thu
s, at the cost of a simple additional multiplicative factor in any standard
NMO/DMO operator to produce the corresponding TZO operator, the amplitude
factor attributed to curvature effects in finite offset data is transformed
by this TZO processing to the corresponding curvature factor for zero offs
et data.
This problem has also been addressed in a more general context by Tygel and
associates. However, in the generality, some of the specifics and interpre
tations of the simpler problem are lost. Thus, we see some value in present
ing this analysis where one can carry out all calculations explicitly and s
ee specific quantities that are more familiar and accessible to users of DM
O.
Furthermore, in this paper, we show how processing of the input data with a
second TZO operator allows for the extraction of the cosine of the preserv
ed specular angle, a necessary piece of information for amplitude versus an
gle (AVA) analysis. We then discuss the possibility of using the output of
our processing formalism at multiple offsets to create a table of angularly
dependent reflection coefficients and attendant incidence angles as a func
tion of offset. This is the basis of a proposed amplitude versus offset/amp
litude versus angle (AVO/AVA) analysis of the pseudozero offset traces.
Finally, we describe the modifications of Hale DMO and Gardner/Forel DMO to
obtain true amplitude output equivalent to ours and also how to extract th
e cosine of the specular angle for these forms of DMO. This last does not d
epend on true amplitude processing, but only on processing two DMO operator
s with slightly different kernels and then taking the quotient of their pea
k amplitudes.