Morphologic diversification among rostroconch molluscs is explored usi
ng multiple phylogenies derived from different methods. In addition to
strict parsimony, phylogenetic estimates were derived using four diff
erent methods that employ stratigraphic data. The resultant phylogenie
s are generally very similar to one another and to the phylogeny propo
sed by Pojeta and Runnegar (1976). All estimates (including the Pojeta
and Runnegar estimate) imply much lower morphologic separations among
post-Ordovician rostroconchs (measured here as the frequency of chara
cter state change per branch) than among Cambro-Ordovician rostroconhs
. However, the data do not suggest that morphologic evolution became m
ore constrained among rostroconchs as a whole, but instead suggest a r
educed characteristic rate of morphologic change in the clade that hap
pened to survive the end-Ordovician extinction. Likelihood ratio tests
provide strongest support for the hypothesis that morphologic evoluti
on was more constrained within a derived subclade (corresponding to pr
evious definitions of the Conocardioidea, minus the Eopteriidae) than
it was in a broad paraphylum (corresponding to the Ribeirioidea + Eopt
eriidae). Estimates from each of the phylogenetic methods lead to the
same conclusions. Various metrics indicate that the pattern is not due
to poor sampling of Cambro-Ordovician species and thus merits a biolo
gical explanation. Nonphylogenetic analyses of morphologic disparity s
uggest a similar history of morphologic evolution, including the appar
ent difference in characteristic rates of morphologic evolution betwee
n paraclade and subclade.