How to select fair improving directions in a negotiation model over continuous issues

Citation
H. Ehtamo et al., How to select fair improving directions in a negotiation model over continuous issues, IEEE SYST C, 29(1), 1999, pp. 26-33
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
AI Robotics and Automatic Control
Journal title
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS
ISSN journal
10946977 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
26 - 33
Database
ISI
SICI code
1094-6977(199902)29:1<26:HTSFID>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Empirical evidence suggests that in practice it is difficult to reach Paret o optimal agreements in negotiations. In this paper, we take a constructive approach to this question in two-party negotiations over continuous issues . A new negotiation procedure is presented that results in Pareto optimal a greements under fairly general assumptions. The procedure uses a mediator w ho assists the decision makers (DM's) by choosing jointly beneficial compro mises, The procedure has the appealing feature that the DM's are only requi red to answer relatively simple questions and their individual utility func tions need not be identified completely. Moreover, the DM's reveal minimal private information to the mediator, These are properties that we would hop e to have in practical procedures to be incorporated in operational negotia tion support systems.