Costing of reproductive health services

Citation
Md. Mitchell et al., Costing of reproductive health services, INT FAM PL, 25, 1999, pp. S17
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology & Antropology
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES
ISSN journal
01903187 → ACNP
Volume
25
Year of publication
1999
Supplement
S
Database
ISI
SICI code
0190-3187(199901)25:<S17:CORHS>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Context: The principles endorsed by delegates to the 1994 International Con ference on Population and Development expanded on the areas typically inclu ded in reproductive health. Yet implementation of more comprehensive reprod uctive health programs has been slow, and the impediments to program expans ion need to be identified Methods: The elements of a reproductive health care program were identified , and in 1995, the disaggregated costs of providing some of these services were gathered from a program of the Zimbabwe National Family Planning Counc il (ZNFPC) and from MEXFAM, a nongovernmental organization in Mexico affili ated with the International Planned Parenthood Federation. These data were used to estimate and compare the costs (in U.S. dollars) of various compone nts of reproductive health care per visit (or per diagnosis and treatment) in the two countries. Results: The costs of providing contraceptive methods, particularly surgica l ones, as well as gynecologic and general health services, varied between ZNFPC and MEXFAM. Whereas tubal ligation cost $70 and oral contraceptives $ 3 at ZNFPC, a tubal ligation cost $269 and oral contraceptives $4 at MEXFAM . During a gynecologic visit, the cost of treatment fora sexually transmitt ed disease was $19 at ZNFPC and $29 at MEXFAM. The cost of providing an ado lescent with a routine examination and iron supplement was $5 at ZNFPG and $4 at MEXFAM. At ZNFPC, providing a Pap smear, screening for a reproductive tract infection and checking an IUD during a single visit cost $4, compare d with $6 when the procedures were performed separately. Conclusions: Costing reproductive health programs requires breaking service components into individual cost elements. This process can help managers u nderstand both the financial and programmatic implications of alternative i mplementation strategies.