Jm. Bellon et al., PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL ASPECTS OF REPAIR OF LARGE INCISIONAL HERNIAS AFTER IMPLANT OF A POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE PROSTHESIS, World journal of surgery, 21(4), 1997, pp. 402-407
One of the alternatives for the repair of large incisional hernias is
the use of a prosthetic material. The present retrospective study rela
tes the experience acquired for treatment of large incisional hernias
(hernial orifice > 10 cm) with ePTFE prostheses. Thirty-eight massive
incisional hernias were repaired using ePTFE 1 mm thick Soft Tissue Pa
tches. Twenty-four patients received a prosthetic patch of 10 x 15 cm,
13 a patch of 15 x 20 cm, and 1 a patch of 20 x 30 cm. In 30 cases th
e ePTFE was sutured to the recipient tissues with a double row of poly
propylene stitches. For the first eight interventions the ePTFE was se
cured using a single row of polypropylene sutures. Pathologic studies
of biopsies from patients who bad undergone surgical reintervention at
40 days, 12 months, and 48 months, respectively, were done using ligh
t microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and immunohistochemistry w
ith human antimacrophage antibodies KP-1. The follow-up period for all
patients was between 18 and 72 months. There was no perioperative mor
tality. No infection or rejection of prostheses was recorded. Seroma w
as present in four patients. Computed tomography was performed for eva
luation purposes on 10 randomly selected patients (mean postoperative
delay 1-4 years) and showed the ePTFE encapsulated by newly formed tis
sue. One of the patients suffered from mechanical intestinal obstructi
on 40 days after implant and suffered a recurrence a year later. Three
recurrences at the patch-recipient tissue interface where the ePTFE h
ad been secured with a single row of polypropylene stitches were recor
ded after 8, 12, and 28 months. At 40 days good integration of the bio
material was observed in the newly formed tissue. On both sides of the
implant an accumulation of four to six strata of cells was appreciabl
e. Some of them were labeled with KP-1. Cell infiltration of the prost
hesis was restricted to the most exterior third of the patch. There wa
s no colonization at the patch-recipient tissue interface. At 12 and 2
8 months the cell barrier had almost disappeared. KP-1-labeled macroph
ages were scarce. Scanning electron microscopy revealed a well defined
peritoneum. It may be concluded that: (1) a double suture row is reco
mmended to secure the prosthesis; (2) ePTFE provides an adequate subst
rate for the formation of scar tissue; and (3) the macrophage response
induced by the ePTFE decreases with time.