J. Rovamo et al., DETECTION OF GEOMETRIC IMAGE DISTORTIONS AT VARIOUS ECCENTRICITIES, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 38(5), 1997, pp. 1029-1039
Purpose. Human ability to perceive spatial stimuli declines with incre
asing eccentricity. To study this phenomenon with natural images, the
authors applied the spatial scaling method by measuring the smallest d
etectable amount of geometric change in a human face at several eccent
ricities for a series of stimulus magnifications to find out whether p
erformance could be made equal across the visual field simply by an ap
propriate enlargement. Methods. The authors used a novel method to pro
duce subtle changes to an image of a face. The smallest change recogni
zed was determined using a two-alternative forced-choice method and ex
pressed in terms of correlation sensitivity, the inverse of the correl
ation between the images that just could be discriminated. Results. Th
e detection of changes in the facial features, presumably a spatially
complex task, became equal across the visual field simply by an approp
riate change of scale. The E-2 value represents the eccentricity at wh
ich the foveal stimulus size must double to maintain performance at th
e foveal level. The E-2 values, found to be 1.73 degrees to 2.45 degre
es, were similar to our previously measured values for vernier acuity,
orientation discrimination, and curvature detection and discriminatio
n, obtained with the same method of spatial scaling. Results. The dete
ction of changes in the facial features, presumably a spatially comple
x task, became equal across the visual field simply by an appropriate
change of scale. The E-2 value represents the eccentricity at which th
e foveal stimulus size must double to maintain performance at the fove
al level. The E-2 values, found to be 1.73 degrees to 2.45 degrees, we
re similar to our previously measured values for vernier acuity, orien
tation discrimination, and curvature detection and discrimination, obt
ained with the same method of spatial scaling. Conclusions. The author
s' results indicate that with adequate stimulus magnification, one is
capable of detecting geometric changes in complex images such as face
equally at the fovea and in the periphery. In this task, there seems t
o be no qualitative difference between the accuracy of foveal and peri
pheral processing.