Kw. Wright et al., Binocular function and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by myopic photorefractive keratectomy, J CAT REF S, 25(2), 1999, pp. 177-182
Purpose: To measure binocular function and patient satisfaction with monovi
sion induced by photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in myopic presbyopic pati
ents.
Setting: Refractive Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Methods: This study comprised 21 myopic presbyopic patients with monovision
induced by PRK. Sixteen emmetropic patients who had PRK served as a contro
l group. Monovision was induced by undercorrecting the nondominant eye by 1
.25 diopters for near vision and correcting the dominant eye with emmetropi
a for distance vision. Monocular and binocular uncorrected Snellen visual a
cuities at 20 feet and 13 inches, manifest refraction, ocular dominance, st
ereopsis at 20 feet and 13 inches, monocular and binocular contrast sensiti
vities, Worth-4-Dot test at 20 feet and 1/3 of a meter, and fusional conver
gence amplitudes were examined in each patient.
Results: In the monovision group at near and distance, 20 patients (95.3%)
had binocular visual acuity of 20/25 or better. No patient in the monovisio
n group used reading glasses postoperatively; 4 of 16 patients (25.0%) in t
he control group used such glasses. Ali patients maintained binocular fusio
n and stereo acuity ranging from 40 to 800 seconds of are. Mean patient sat
isfaction was 86% (range 40% to 100%). In the control group. 12 patients (7
5.0%) had binocular distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better and 11 (68.8%
) had binocular near visual acuity of 20/125 or better.
Conclusion: Monovision PRK patients had better near vision than control PRK
patients, with minimal compromise in stereo acuity and overall high patien
t Satisfaction.