Da. Nelson et al., Prevalence of osteoporosis in women referred for bone density testing - Utility of multiple skeletal sites, J CLIN DENS, 1(1), 1998, pp. 5-11
The objective of this study was to determine retrospectively the prevalence
of osteoporosis in a referral population and to compare the effectiveness
of measuring multiple skeletal sites for identifying osteoporosis. Although
osteoporosis is considered to be a major public health problem in the Unit
ed States, and there are reliable methods for diagnosis based on bone densi
tometry, fewer than 25% of cases are currently identified. There is no cons
ensus about which skeletal site(s) should be measured fog optimal results.
in this study, bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy X-ray
absorptiometry (DXA) at the radius (proximal site), lumbar spine, femoral
neck, and total proximal femur regions in 537 consecutive white females age
50 and older referred by community physicians for bone densitometry. The p
revalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis (based on the World Health Organiz
ation definitions) was determined, as well as the incidence of misclassific
ation of patients based on different skeletal sites. Overall, 53.3% had ost
eoporosis, an additional 37.7% had osteopenia, and only 8.7% had normal BMD
at all measurement sites. The prevalence was similar at all measurement si
tes and the incidence of misclassification was low. Given the magnitude of
undetected osteoporosis and the efficacy of bone densitometry at any skelet
al site, these data have important implications for the optimal deployment
of bone density measurement facilities.