Prevalence of osteoporosis in women referred for bone density testing - Utility of multiple skeletal sites

Citation
Da. Nelson et al., Prevalence of osteoporosis in women referred for bone density testing - Utility of multiple skeletal sites, J CLIN DENS, 1(1), 1998, pp. 5-11
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY
ISSN journal
10946950 → ACNP
Volume
1
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
5 - 11
Database
ISI
SICI code
1094-6950(199821)1:1<5:POOIWR>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine retrospectively the prevalence of osteoporosis in a referral population and to compare the effectiveness of measuring multiple skeletal sites for identifying osteoporosis. Although osteoporosis is considered to be a major public health problem in the Unit ed States, and there are reliable methods for diagnosis based on bone densi tometry, fewer than 25% of cases are currently identified. There is no cons ensus about which skeletal site(s) should be measured fog optimal results. in this study, bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the radius (proximal site), lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total proximal femur regions in 537 consecutive white females age 50 and older referred by community physicians for bone densitometry. The p revalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis (based on the World Health Organiz ation definitions) was determined, as well as the incidence of misclassific ation of patients based on different skeletal sites. Overall, 53.3% had ost eoporosis, an additional 37.7% had osteopenia, and only 8.7% had normal BMD at all measurement sites. The prevalence was similar at all measurement si tes and the incidence of misclassification was low. Given the magnitude of undetected osteoporosis and the efficacy of bone densitometry at any skelet al site, these data have important implications for the optimal deployment of bone density measurement facilities.