Ja. Bridgewater et al., Comparison of standard and CA-125 response criteria in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with platinum or paclitaxel, J CL ONCOL, 17(2), 1999, pp. 501-508
Purpose: To assess CA-125 as a measure of response in patients treated with
paclitaxel.
Patients and Methods: One hundred forty-four patients treated with paclitax
el derived from four different trials and 625 patients treated with platinu
m from two trials were analyzed using precisely defined 50% and 75% reducti
ons in CA-125. The standard and CA-125 response rates to paclitaxel and pla
tinum were compared. In addition, we analyzed individual patient groups in
which there was a difference in response according to the two response crit
eria.
Results: Patients with stable disease as determined by standard criteria wh
o were treated with platinum and responded according to CA-125 criteria hav
e an improved median progression-free survival compared with patients with
stable disease who did not respond according to CA-125 criteria (10.6 v 4.8
months; P <.001). Standard and CA-125 response rates for patients treated
with platinum (58.93% v 61.31%, respectively) and paclitaxel (30.65% v 31.6
7%, respectively) were very similar, as were rates of false-positive predic
tion of response by CA-125 (platinum 2.2% and paclitaxel 2.9%). Responders
to paclitaxel had a significantly improved progression-free survival compar
ed with nonresponders by both standard criteria (median progression-free su
rvival, 6.8 v 2.5 months; P <.001) and CA-125 criteria (median progression-
free survival, 6.8 v 3.4 months; P <.001).
Conclusion: For assessing activity of therapy for ovarian cancer, these dat
a show that precise 50% or 75% CA-125 response criteria are as sensitive as
standard response criteria. We propose that they may be used as a measure
of response in lieu of or in addition to standard response criteria in clin
ical trials involving epithelial ovarian cancer. Sensitivity is maintained
whether patients are treated with platinum or paclitaxel. (C) 1999 by Ameri
can Society of Clinical Oncology.