A multilevel analysis of factors affecting pocket probing depth in patients responding differently to periodontal treatment

Citation
B. Axtelius et al., A multilevel analysis of factors affecting pocket probing depth in patients responding differently to periodontal treatment, J CLIN PER, 26(2), 1999, pp. 67-76
Citations number
57
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
ISSN journal
03036979 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
67 - 76
Database
ISI
SICI code
0303-6979(199902)26:2<67:AMAOFA>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
3 distinct levels are involved in the periodontal inflammatory process: sit e, tooth, and individual. By focusing attention on the levels in the popula tion, multilevel or hierarchical modelling (MLM) enables the researcher to understand where and how the effects at the levels involved are occurring. The aim of this paper is therefore to analyse the progression of periodonta l disease using analytical models that consider the level hierarchy. 22 pat ients with periodontitis, in previous reports described as either non-respo nsive or responsive to periodontal treatment, were investigated. In the mul tilevel modelling method (MLM), the site pocket probing depth (PPD) is summ arised in 3 parameters: the overall mean, the between-individual variance, and the within-individual, between-site variance. The model can readily be extended to include independent variables for sites, teeth and individuals. If these variables are important determinants of PPD, their inclusion in t he model will lead to a reduction in residual variances between sites, teet h and individuals. The PPDs were used for construction of a PPD change vari able (cPPD). This variable, together with the final registrations of PPD (f PPD) alone, were used as dependent variables in the MLM. Independent predic tor variables, 12 on site-level, 3 on tooth-level, and 19 on individual-lev el, were constructed. The total number of sites assessed was 2236 distribut ed on 559 teeth in 22 subjects. Initially, a fixed, fully unconditional mod el (models A and E) was assessed, where no predictor variables were specifi ed at any level. Different random-intercept models (B-D, F-H) were then cal culated where the independent variables were inserted in blocks relating to each level. The Variance components at all 3 levels were significantly lar ger than zero. This indicates that MLM is recommended for analysing the pre sent data. The inserted predictors showed 100% sensitivity relating to the subject-level variance. Subsequent testing of the patient with disease or a t high risk of disease would have to focus on diagnostic tests aimed at the individual teeth and sites. These tests would need to have a balance of se nsitivity and specificity. Thus, by using multilevel modelling, the theoret ical understanding of important factors in the pathogenesis of periodontiti s is stimulated.