Using a sample of 628 carveouts during 1981-1995, this paper finds that the
newly issued subsidiary stocks do not underperform appropriate benchmarks
over a three-year period following the carveout. This result is in striking
contrast with the documented poor performance of initial public offerings
and seasoned equity offerings. I conjecture that the superior performance o
f subsidiary stocks arises because the subsidiary and parent firms can focu
s on fewer business segments after carveout, and because the parent firms c
ontinue to own a monitoring position in the subsidiary firms. I test whethe
r the subsidiary stock performance is related to the number of business seg
ments the parent firm has before carveout. The relationship is not always s
ignificant, which suggests another possible explanation, that the market ma
y react efficiently to the likely future performance of carveouts. (C) 1999
Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.