In this paper we present results of a simulation study to assess and compar
e the accuracy of forecasting techniques for long-memory processes in small
sample sizes. We analyse differences between adaptive ARMA(1,1) L-step for
ecasts, where the parameters are estimated by minimizing the sum of squares
of L-step forecast errors, and forecasts obtained by using long-memory mod
els. We compare widths of the forecast intervals for both methods, and disc
uss some computational issues associated with the ARMA(1,1) method. Our res
ults illustrate the importance and usefulness of long-memory models for mul
ti-step forecasting. Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.